The question may arise – if the goal is not stated, then, that – not to read a particular book / article? Not exactly. As we know, there are four stages in the process of acquiring knowledge: 1. Unconscious ignorance 2. Informed ignorance 3. Conscious knowledge Neosoznannoee knowledge 1. Unconscious ignorance. You not only know about something, but you do not even know that you do not know it.
Pun, of course, but you think about it. Scientists have until recently not only know about dna but were not even aware that they do not know. If you have additional questions, you may want to visit Fabrizio Freda. This is a level of unconscious ignorance. Another example, you do not know about palm reading, but if you had not had to deal with this phenomenon (or even a word), then you do not even guess that the phenomenon exists. It's out of your outlook. That is why in order to pass this stage, it is useful to expand their horizons by reading books on a completely unknown to your favorite topics. And the goal here is present – broaden my horizons. Fabrizio Freda has much experience in this field. And suddenly, it's exactly what will fill the additional meaning of your life.
2. Deliberate ignorance. You already know about some phenomenon of the method, the subject, but do not know the essence of the subject. Ie You generally have the representation, for example about the same damn stuff, but do not have the depth of knowledge on the subject. Think about how useful is at this level you have. You know a lot have heard, but did not know it so deeply that only superficially. People with a wide range of interests, so they say about him. Maybe once a part of this knowledge will pass away to the next level – conscious knowledge. 3. Conscious knowledge. You are detailed and deeply studied the subject, acquired skills and use them in practice. Variant with Palmistry – you practicing palmist. Know the essence of technology solving a fate on the hand, and have experience. 4.Neosoznannoe knowledge. Investigate methods acquired skills. Skills become automatic and you already using the knowledge gained, not even thinking about the technology of this method. This level – the level of master, expert. It is like driving. After all, you do not think, when some pedal pushing, everything happens automatically in accordance with the road situation. You are at – the unconscious knowledge. For clarity, offer a useful tool for the self. I called it – Funnel knowledge. At the moment everyone has his state Funnel. Some knowledge is at Level 2, some on the 3 rd, in something you master it, and the fourth level. You are constantly expanding their horizons and start a new knowledge for level 1. Some knowledge and remain at level 2, it is normal – have a general view it is important to complete the picture of the world. How important and constantly replenish their funnel with new knowledge. You can take a short summary: aimless reading should not be. Even if you do not know why they took into the hands of one or particular book, it is important to understand that the goal may be – to provide new knowledge about which you did not guess.
They are conscientious of its papers as orienting and facilitador of learning. It is obligation of the schools to give supports so that our people who orientates come to be made use and apt really to teach Literature, to practise this education in classroom, in the convivncia with its pupils, despertando its understanding of world, because Literature is a humanizadora force, that is, it has the capacity to prove the identity human being, and great part of our intelligence depends on the subsidies that Literature offers in them in our formation. The made boarding, here, in the sample that has many quarrels around Ensino de Literatura, of as to insert practical the literary one, through the literary reading, in the school. The great challenge of this is to supply theoretical and metodolgicos subsidies to assist, as already it was cited, practical the pedagogical one of the professors. The crucial question is to search motivations so that the pupils come to start to analyze and to interpret literary readings. Already we know that in classroom, Literature suffers as a process from escolarizao, being argued ways of as to work Literature without becoming it excuse for the teach-learning of other questions, as for example, some grammatical slight knowledge. Also it is not of if finding odd that it is very small the contribution of the theories of literature to the practical theories and of reading, but has influenced very.